This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal

LEON COHEN, Ph.D.

A.M.A. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1959;81(6):765-775.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Reversible figures are drawings in which figure and ground appear to alternate on continued inspection (e. g., the Rubin vase, Fig. 1A), or in which perspective appears to shift (e. g., the Necker cube, Fig. 1B); in yet a third type, a moving pattern, such as the vanes of a windmill, seems to reverse the direction of its movement. The neural mechanisms underlying these apparent fluctuations remain obscure, despite numerous investigations involving such aspects of the patterns as size (Washburn, Mallay, and Naylor³⁴; Cohen⁵), "complexity" (Donahue and Griffitts⁷; Washburn, Reagan, and Thurston³⁵), or brightness (Mull, Ord, and Locke¹⁹).

That retrochiasmal processes are involved, however, is suggested by two facts: (a) In figures with reversible perspective or movement, rate of apparent change (RAC) increases with continued fixation (Köhler¹⁵; Brown³; Cohen⁵), and (b) inspection of a reversible figure with one eye causes an . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Durham, N. C.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication July 31, 1958.

Dr. H. L. Teuber, Director of the Psychophysiological Laboratory, assisted in all phases of the present investigation.

Financial assistance was obtained from the Commonwealth Fund of New York through its support to the Psychophysiological Laboratory.